HUMAN 2.0: HOMO-PETROLEOSUS BECOMES HOMO-SOLARUS
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Homo Socialis and Homo Sapiens
The assumption that individuals are behaving rationally can, at times, usefully constrain predictions of individual and collective behavior. However, success in predicting human and group behavior will often require relaxing this assumption of rationality, instead employing evolutionary, neural, and cognitive constraints. One particularly important form of neural and cognitive constraint is tha...
متن کاملFrom Wald to Savage: homo economicus becomes a Bayesian statistician.
Bayesian rationality is the paradigm of rational behavior in neoclassical economics. An economic agent is deemed rational when she maximizes her subjective expected utility and consistently revises her beliefs according to Bayes's rule. The paper raises the question of how, when and why this characterization of rationality came to be endorsed by mainstream economists. Though no definitive answe...
متن کاملHomo floresiensis: microcephalic, pygmoid, Australopithecus, or Homo?
The remarkable partial adult skeleton (LB1) excavated from Liang Bua cave on the island of Flores, Indonesia, has been attributed to a new species, Homo floresiensis, based upon a unique mosaic of primitive and derived features compared to any other hominin. The announcement precipitated widespread interest, and attention quickly focused on its possible affinities. LB1 is a small-bodied hominin...
متن کاملFrom Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens
R esponding to a request for a forecast is especially tricky for someone like me, who specializes in other people’s biases. Research in psychology suggests that certain biases are very likely to creep into my forecasts about the future of economics (or anything else). 1. Optimism (and wishful thinking). We all tend to be optimistic about the future. On the first day of my MBA class on decision-...
متن کاملHomo artefactus.
A re the differences between humans and other animals “one of degree and not of kind,” as Charles Darwin concluded in his book, The descent of man? Derek C Penn from UCLA and his co-authors claim that Darwin was mistaken [1] and that the profound biological continuity between human and nonhuman animals masks an equally profound discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Minor anatomical ch...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Artifact
سال: 2008
ISSN: 1749-3463,1749-3471
DOI: 10.1080/17493460802480495